Vang

People v. Vang

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 5th 377·2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 565·204 Cal. Rptr. 3d 455
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 2016C075731California4,277 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

In this case, we conclude the death of a structure’s inhabitant renders that structure uninhabited within the meaning of the arson statute. This is so even where the arsonists murder that inhabitant before setting fire to the structure.

Defendant Joson Vang and his cousin, Ronnie Vang, broke into Keith Fessler’s house to steal some property. Fessler was home at the time. When he came out of a back bedroom and confronted the burglars, they beat him, tied him up, and Ronnie executed him with two shots to the back of the head. After taking several items from the house and leaving with these items in Fessler’s car, defendant and Ronnie came back and set fire to the house. Defendant and Ronnie were tried together before separate juries. Defendant’s jury convicted him of first degree murder, first degree burglary, robbery, arson of an inhabited structure, and the unauthorized taking or driving of a vehicle. With respect to the murder, the jury found the crime was committed during the commission of both a burglary and a robbery. The jury also found a principal was armed with a firearm during the commission of the murder, burglary, and robbery. The trial court sentenced…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.