Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 5th 452·2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 572·204 Cal. Rptr. 3d 663
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 2016B245131California7,124 words

Opinion

Opinion

Turner, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant, Department of Fish and Wildlife (the department), and real party in interest, The Newhall Land and Farming Company (the developer), appeal from a judgment granting a mandate petition. The judgment, entered October 15, 2012, was granted in favor of plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity; Friends of the Santa Clara River; Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment; Wishtoyo Foundation/Ventura Coastkeeper; and California Native Plant Society. The litigation and appeal arise from the department’s December 3, 2010 certification of the revised final environmental impact statement and impact report; approval of the Newhall Ranch Resource Management and Development Plan (resource management and development plan); the adoption of the Spine flower Conservation Plan and Master Streambed Alteration Agreement (streambed alteration agreement); and issuance of two incidental take permits. We issued an opinion reversing the October 15, 2012 judgment. (Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife (Cal.App.).) Our Supreme Court granted review and, after issuing an opinion, remanded the case to us. (Center for Biological…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.