Roebel
Roebel v. Vampola CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 7/15/16 Roebel v. Vampola CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
KENNETH ROEBEL et al., D067812
Plaintiffs, Cross-Defendants and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2013-00042247- v. CL-BC-NC)
JAMES VAMPOLA et al.,
Defendants, Cross-Complainants and Respondents,
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Earl H.
Maas III, Judge. Affirmed.
Kenneth Roebel and Chayapha Roebel, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs, Cross-
Defendants and Appellants.
James Vampola and Jennifer Vampola, in pro. per., for Defendants, Cross-
Complainant and Respondents.
This case arises from a dispute between plaintiffs and appellants, Kenneth Roebel
and Chayapha Roebel (together Roebel) and their…