Parske

Parske v. County of Sacramento CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2016C074808California2,369 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 7/15/16 Parske v. County of Sacramento CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

KRISTEN PARSKE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, C074808

v. (Super. Ct. No. 34201200123646)

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

Defendant and Respondent.

Kristen Parske appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted a motion for summary judgment brought by her former employer, the County of Sacramento (County). The County moved for summary judgment on grounds Parske could not establish her claims under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act

1 (FEHA). (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.)1 The trial court granted the County’s motion and entered a judgment of dismissal from which Parske appeals. On appeal, Parske…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.