In re R.H. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2016G052902California2,516 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fybel, J.

INTRODUCTION

The juvenile court found, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, that R.H. (now four years old), J.H. (now three years old), and Mi.H. (now two years old) were adoptable, and that none of the exceptions to termination of parental rights applied. (All further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) The court therefore terminated the parental rights of Ma.H. (father) and M.O. (mother). Both father and mother separately appealed. Because substantial evidence supports the juvenile court’s findings, we affirm the order.

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Based on injuries inflicted on J.H. by mother, the juvenile court declared J.H., as well as his siblings, Mc.H., R.H., and Mi.H., to be dependents of the juvenile court. The court also denied reunification services to mother and father for all the children, except Mc.H., and found all four children would suffer detriment if they were to remain in mother and father’s custody and control. The facts leading to the court’s jurisdiction and disposition orders are detailed in two previous unpublished opinions, Ma.H. v. Superior Court (Aug. 27, 2015, G051997) and In re Mc.H.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.