Maria Hernandez v. Williams, Zinman & Parham Pc

Good Law
829 F.3d 1068·2016 WL 3913445·2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13242
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 201614-15672California6,211 words

Opinion

Opinion

Friedland, J.

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”) requires that within five days of “the initial communication” with a consumer about the collection of a debt, a debt collector must send the consumer a notice containing specified disclosures. 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a). The question presented here is whether the phrase “the initial communication” as used in the FDCPA means the first communication from the initial debt collector that tries to collect, or whether it means the first communication a consumer receives from any collector about a debt, including subsequent collectors that communicate about the same debt.

Applying well-established tools of statutory interpretation and construing the language in § 1692g(a) in light of the context and purpose of the FDCPA, we hold that the phrase “the initial communication” refers to the first communication sent by any debt collector, including collectors that contact the debtor after another collector already did. In other words, if there are multiple debt collectors that try to collect a debt, each one must send the required notice after its first communication with the alleged debtor about the debt. Because the district court held…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.