People v. Case CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 20, 2016E063904California1,529 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

The People appeal from an order granting the petition of defendant Justin Alan

Case for resentencing of his conviction of second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459)1 to

misdemeanor shoplifting (§ 459.5). The People contend that defendant’s offense did not

qualify for resentencing under section 1170.18 because defendant entered a bank to cash

fictitious checks, not to commit shoplifting, and a bank is not a commercial establishment

for purposes of section 459.5. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On January 12, 2012, defendant was charged in a felony complaint with two

counts of second degree burglary (§ 459; counts 1 & 3) and two counts of check forgery

(§ 476; counts 2 & 4). Specifically, the complaint alleged in counts 1 and 3 that on

January 3 and 6, 2012, defendant “did willfully and unlawfully enter a certain building

located at 1130 W SIXTH STREET, CORONA, with intent to commit theft and a

felony.”

Defendant plead guilty on February 22, 2012, to counts 1 and 3; counts 2 and

were dismissed. At the plea hearing, the trial court asked, “Is it true that on the day in

question—what was it? A store?[2] You went somewhere where you weren’t…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.