Peter Deacon v. Pandora Media

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 201612-17734California171 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUL 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

PETER DEACON, individually and on No. 12-17734 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 4:11-cv-04674-SBA Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. ORDER*

PANDORA MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 11, 2015 San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and HUCK,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern Florida, sitting by designation. On February 24, 2015, we certified a question to the Michigan Supreme

Court, which it modified and answered on July 6, 2016.

In view of the Court’s answer, which dispositively resolves this case, the

judgment of the district court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.