In re I.G. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
FACTS
The child was detained on November 9, 2014. On that same date, father told
Riverside County Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) that he may have
Cherokee and Blackfoot ancestry. In father’s ICWA-020 form, father again identified
possible Cherokee and Blackfoot ancestry. In November 2014, the juvenile court
directed DPSS to provide notice under ICWA. DPSS filed a Notice of the Child Custody
Proceeding for Indian Child on December 10, 2014. The notice did not include complete
information for father, his parents or his grandparents.
DPSS was in contact with paternal grandfather regarding assessment for
placement. Paternal grandfather appeared several times in juvenile court. Minor was
placed with paternal grandfather on July 2, 2015. Paternal grandfather reported he was in
contact with seven members of the paternal side of the family. Despite the contact with
paternal grandfather, DPSS did not inquire about the paternal family’s Native American
ancestry, and no new ICWA notice was sent to tribes.
2 On May 13, 2015, the court found that ICWA did not apply.