People v. Morales CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 2016B264847California2,907 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

A jury convicted defendant and appellant Mario Morales of forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(2)1) and found true the allegations that in the commission of the rape, defendant used a deadly weapon (a knife) (§ 12022.3, subd. (a)); kidnapped the victim and the movement of the victim substantially increased the risk of harm to the victim (§ 667.61, subds. (a) & (d)); and kidnapped the victim, personally used a deadly or dangerous weapon, and tied or bound the victim (§ 667.61, subds. (a) & (c)). Defendant admitted that he suffered a prior conviction under the Three Strikes law (§§ 667, subs. (b)-(i) & 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)), a prior serious felony conviction (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)), and three prior convictions for which he served a prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced defendant to 67 years to life in state prison. On appeal, defendant contends that his rape prosecution was barred by the 10-year statute of limitations in section 801.1, subdivision (b), and the trial court violated his right to due process when it admitted evidence of a prior sexual assault. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

I. Marlene T.’s (Marlene) Testimony

In October 2001,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.