Frymer

Frymer v. Hollins Law CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2016B267213California6,903 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/22/16 Frymer v. Hollins Law CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

DAVID FRYMER et al., B267213

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC532875) v.

HOLLINS LAW et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Theresa Sanchez-Gordon, Judge. Reversed and remanded. Law Offices of Martina A. Silas and Martina A. Silas, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Nemecek & Cole, Jonathan B. Cole, Claudia L. Stone, and Mark Schaeffer, for Defendants and Respondents. ______________________________ In this malicious prosecution action, David Frymer and Frymer Development, Inc. (respectively “Frymer” and “Frymer Development”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.