Michael Grady v. Jonathan Levin

Good Law
655 F. App'x 601
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 201614-16457California387 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

This case centers on whether Michael and Jennifer Grady (the Gradys) can assert violations of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. § 1601 et seq., against Tri City National Bank (TCNB) for conduct preceding its acquisition of the assets of a failed bank. In 2008, the Gradys entered into a loan with the Bank of Elm-wood. The bank was subsequently placed into receivership, and its assets were purchased by TCNB. The district court denied the Gradys’ motion for leave to amend their complaint to add TILA claims against TCNB, finding that amendment would be futile. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

We hold that the Gradys’ proposed TILA claims against TCNB “relat[e] to any act or omission” of the original bank— the Bank of Elmwood—and are subject to dismissal under the Financial Institutions, Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) of 1989, 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(13)(D)(ii). The Gradys’ proposed TILA claim that stems from alleged disclosure defects in the original loan documents, see 15 U.S.C. § 1641 (e), is “based on the conduct of the failed institution” because the operative loan documents were drafted and executed by the Bank of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.