Starla Rollins v. Dignity Health

Good Law
830 F.3d 900·2016 WL 3997259·62 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1257·2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 13574
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 201615-15351California5,156 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

Plaintiff-Appellee Starla Rollins filed this putative class action against her former employer, Defendant-Appellant Dignity Health, its Chief Human Resources Officer, unnamed members of its Retirement Subcommittee, and other unnamed fiduciaries (collectively “Dignity Health”), alleging that Dignity Health has not maintained its pension plan in compliance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Dignity Health concedes it has not complied with ERISA, but contends its plan qualifies for ERISA’s church-plan exemption. See id. §§ 1002(33), 1003(b)(2). The district court held that a pension plan must have been established by a church, or by a convention or association of churches, to qualify as a church plan. Because the district court found that Dignity Health’s pension plan was not established by a church, or by a convention or association of churches, the court awarded partial summary judgment to Rollins, ruling that Dignity Health’s pension plan must comply with ERISA. We accepted jurisdiction in this interlocutory appeal to address whether the district court was correct to hold that a church plan must be established by a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.