People v. Vega CA4/3
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Frank Xavier Vega appeals from an order revoking and reinstating his parole. Appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), setting forth the facts of the case and requesting we review the entire record. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), appointed counsel identified a potential issue to assist us in our independent review. Vega was granted 30 days to file written arguments in his own behalf. He filed a supplemental brief. We have examined the entire record, counsel’s Wende/Anders brief, and Vega’s supplemental brief. After considering the entire record, we have found no reasonably arguable issue. (Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) We therefore affirm.
BACKGROUND
In October 2015, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed a petition seeking the revocation of Vega’s parole. The petition stated that on August 13, 2015, Vega had been convicted of failing to register as a sex offender under Penal Code section 290.018, subdivision (b), and was sentenced to a prison term of one year four months. On September 22, Vega was released on parole with terms and conditions…