Ghazal

Ghazal v. Wiederkehr CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 26, 2016D069670California7,911 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

facts in the light most favorable to the judgment. (See Carter v. Escondido Union High School Dist. (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 922, 926, fn. 1.) 3 [V]ixen [T]rail house. I promise you I will do whatever it takes to make sure that you are

secure and happy with this deal."

In January 2012 Jeff and Annelle gave Albert and Donna permission to move into

the house. Handing Albert the house keys, Annelle said, "This house is yours and I'm

going to do whatever it takes to get it for you guys." With Annelle and Jeff's permission,

in mid-February 2012 Albert, Donna, and their child moved into the Vixen Trail home.

They were not supposed to pay rent. Albert and Donna leased their former house to a

family under a two-year lease because they considered the Vixen Trail house their new

home.

In March 2012 Annelle told Donna the purchase price was $350,000 and that she

(Annelle) would finance the entire amount. Donna had "no doubt" that Annelle had the

financial capability to loan $350,000. There was no negotiation over price. Jeff

proposed the $350,000 price and Donna and Albert thought it was fair. Even though the

house had a leaky roof and history of black mold, that did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.