Lausd

Smith v. Los Angeles Unified School District

Good Law
830 F.3d 843·2016 WL 4011195
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 201614-55224, 14-55256California11,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bea, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed May 20, 2016 is amended as follows:

At Slip Op. k'- Change “Congress enacted the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the ‘IDEA’)” to “Congress enacted the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (which has since been retitled as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the ‘IDEA’)).”

At Slip Op. 7: Change “Cal Ed. Code § 56361” to “Cal. Educ. Code § 56361” and change “ ‘State special schools’ — also known as special education centers” to “ ‘State special schools,’ see Cal. Educ. Code §§ 56361 (f); 56367 — a term of art which includes ‘the California School for the Deaf,’ Cal. Educ. Code § 59020 , and ‘the California School for the Blind,’ id. § 59120.”

At Slip Op. 3&: Change “ — an action expressly prohibited by both the MCD and the Consent Decree.” to Indeed, if anything, statements that LAUSD was engaged in ‘discussions’ to achieve greater compliance with the MCD would have only reinforced Appellants’ belief that LAUSD planned to continue to offer special education centers as part of the ‘full continuum’ of services available to disabled students in LAUSD. LAUSD now takes the position that the MCD does not require it to maintain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.