Putney

People v. Putney

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 5th 1058·2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 619·205 Cal. Rptr. 3d 600
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 27, 2016A142012California4,514 words

Opinion

Opinion

Humes, J.

—Thomas Earl Putney appeals from an order recommitting him to the State Department of State Hospitals (SDSH) for an indeterminate term after a jury found him to be a sexually violent predator (SVP) within the meaning of the Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA). During the pendency of the SVP proceeding, Putney was sentenced to 25 years to life in prison for an intervening criminal offense. We conclude that the trial court lacked authority to recommit Putney as an SVP once his sentence for the intervening criminal conviction became final, and we therefore reverse the order with directions to dismiss the recommitment petition.

I.

Factual and Procedural Background

During the summer of 1990, Putney sexually molested his two- and four-year-old cousins, with whom he lived at the time, and a nine-year-old neighbor. The following year, he pleaded no contest to three felony counts of lewd acts on a child under age 14 based on his offenses against the four- and nine-year-old, and he was sentenced to 10 years in prison.

In October 2002, shortly before Putney was due to be released on parole, the People filed a petition seeking his commitment to a state hospital as an SVP. He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.