United States v. Benny Pangelinan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 201615-10499California222 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 01 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-10499

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00012-RVM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

BENNY K. PANGELINAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of the Northern Mariana Islands Ramona V. Manglona, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 26, 2016**

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Benny Koyama Pangelinan appeals from the revocation of probation and

11-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Pangelinan’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). provided Pangelinan the opportunity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.