Lori Ponce v. U.S. Government

ORDER

The panel has unanimously voted to deny appellant’s petition for panel rehearing. Judges Tallman and Hurwitz voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Tashima so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc, Dkt. No. 41, is DENIED.

The Memorandum Disposition filed on May 10, 2016, is hereby amended as follows:

At the end of Paragraph 2, the following footnote should be added:

769 F.2d 1344, 1346-48 (9th Cir. 1985), Ponce seeks to recover damages from unnamed governmental employees for delays incurred in the processing of her FECA claims.>.

No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM

Lori Lee Ponce appeals the district court’s dismissal of her third amended complaint and denial of leave to amend to assert a Bivens claim against unnamed employees of the Department of Labor (“the…