Schelske

Schelske v. TMZ Productions CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2016B262173California3,177 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/2/16 Schelske v. TMZ Productions CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

CRAIG L. SCHELSKE, B262173

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC560648) v.

TMZ PRODUCTIONS, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Michael L. Stern, Judge. Affirmed.

R. Rex Parris Law Firm, R. Rex Parris, Jason P. Fowler, John M. Bickford, and Sean J. Lowe for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Caldwell Leslie & Proctor, Linda M. Burrow, Arwen R. Johnson, and Amy E. Pomerantz for Defendants and Respondents. ______________________________ Following a television broadcast of allegations regarding a high profile divorce, plaintiff and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.