People v. Ervin CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2016B268787California821 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/2/16 P. v. Ervin CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE, B268787

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MA047039) v.

OTIS FITZGERALD ERVIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Eric P. Harmon, Judge. Affirmed. Rachel Varnell, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. _______________________________________ This is a Wende appeal from a post-judgment order denying appellant Otis Fitzgerald Ervin’s motions to vacate a judgment and enter a default judgment. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) For the reasons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.