Rocky Bixby v. Kbr, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 3, 201615-35702California317 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AUG 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ROCKY BIXBY; LAWRENCE Nos. 15-35702

ROBERTA; RONALD BJERKLUND; 15-35801

CHARLES ELLIS; MATTHEW

HADLEY; COLT CAMPREDON; VITO D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00632-PK

PACHECO; BRIAN HEDIN; CHARLES

SEAMON; AARON ST. CLAIR; BYRON

GREER; JASON ARNOLD, MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

KBR, INC.; KELLOGG, BROWN &

ROOT SERVICE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Paul J. Papak II, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2016** San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: W. FLETCHER and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and WALTER,*** District Judge.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 because the district court’s

dismissal of this case was a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.