Rocky Bixby v. Kbr, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 3, 201615-35702California317 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AUG 03 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ROCKY BIXBY; LAWRENCE Nos. 15-35702
ROBERTA; RONALD BJERKLUND; 15-35801
CHARLES ELLIS; MATTHEW
HADLEY; COLT CAMPREDON; VITO D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00632-PK
PACHECO; BRIAN HEDIN; CHARLES
SEAMON; AARON ST. CLAIR; BYRON
GREER; JASON ARNOLD, MEMORANDUM*
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
KBR, INC.; KELLOGG, BROWN &
ROOT SERVICE, INC.,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Paul J. Papak II, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 22, 2016** San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: W. FLETCHER and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and WALTER,*** District Judge.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 because the district court’s
dismissal of this case was a…