Bo Li v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
667 F. App'x 937
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 3, 201614-70357California283 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Bo Xin Li, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination in light of inconsistencies between Li’s testimony and his wife’s testimony regarding the harm Li experienced and fears for voicing his opposition to China’s one-child policy, as well as Li’s inconsistent testimony regarding his return trip to China. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination reasonable under the “totality of circumstances”). We reject Li’s contention regarding notice and an opportunity to produce corroborative evidence because the BIA did not rely on Li’s failure to provide corroboration in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.