FTC v. Jonathan Eborn

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 201614-16485California693 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 04 2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, No. 14-16485

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01112-GMN-VCF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

INFUSION MEDIA, INC., et al.,

Defendants,

and

JONATHAN EBORN, individually and as an officer of Infusion Media, Inc., Two Warnings, LLC., Two Part Investments, LLC., and West Coast Internet Media, Inc.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 21, 2016 San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. Before: GRABER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,** Senior District Judge.

Defendant-appellant Jonathan Eborn appeals from the district court’s order

entering judgment against him in the amount of $26,971,926.50. On October 4,

2010, in resolution of litigation initiated by the Federal Trade Commission (the

“FTC”), a consent judgment was entered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.