Ravinder Kumar v. Loretta E. Lynch

MEMORANDUM

Xiaozhen Weng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and 'withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on an omission of Weng’s father’s eye injury, and inconsistencies regarding Weng’s passport, an alleged guarantee letter, and the conditions of Weng’s release from detention. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the “totality of circumstances,”). Weng’s explanations for the inconsistencies and omission do not compel a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that, even if Weng is Christian and practiced Christianity in the United…