Steiger

Steiger v. Steiger CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 5, 2016D068385California5,568 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 8/5/16 Steiger v. Steiger CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

LEE STEIGER, as Cotrustee, etc., D068385

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2013-00072651-PR-TR-CTL) PAUL STEIGER, as Cotrustee, etc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Julia C.

Kelety, Judge. Affirmed.

Lee Steiger, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Van Dyke & Associates and Richard Scott Van Dyke, Geoffrey J. Farwell, for

Defendant and Respondent.

Lee Steiger petitioned the probate court to compel trustee Paul Steiger to account

for the Louise A. Steiger Trust, for the period from January 10, 2000, to April 18, 2011.

The court applied California law to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.