Bolden
Bolden v. Thigpen CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 8/5/16 Bolden v. Thigpen CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
PLEZANE BOLDEN,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E064115
v. (Super.Ct.No. PSC1501264)
LATOYA THIGPEN, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Randall Donald White,
Judge. Affirmed.
Friedrichs and Associates and Angela J. Friedrichs for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
The trial court issued a civil harassment restraining order protecting plaintiff and
respondent Plezane Bolden from defendant and appellant LaToya Thigpen. (Code Civ.