Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 8, 2016E065144California1,999 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The underlying proceeding involves an accusation filed by the Department of

Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) against Circle K Stores, Inc. (Circle K) in which it

was alleged that on May 20, 2014, 19-year-old Mariah Daily was sold an alcoholic

beverage by a Circle K clerk.

On the date set for hearing of the matter, September 18, 2014, Daily—who had

acted as a decoy—failed to appear. Counsel for the ABC requested a continuance, noting

that the minor had been properly subpoenaed and also informing the court that the minor

was apparently in route. The administrative law judge (ALJ) granted a continuance.

At the renewed hearing on November 19, 2014, counsel for Circle K attempted to

inquire about the subpoena, apparently hoping to challenge whether it had been properly

1 All further statutory references shall be to the Business and Professions Code unless otherwise indicated.

2 served on Daily. However, the ALJ refused to permit such inquiry, casting the matter in

terms of whether it was appropriate to revisit a ruling on the previous continuance. The

ALJ subsequently issued a proposed decision, finding that Circle K’s clerk sold an

alcoholic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.