People v. Vidano CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 2016C076050California3,110 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/9/16 P. v. Vidano CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Siskiyou) ----

THE PEOPLE, C076050

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 13-223, 13-357, 13-468) v.

JUAN ANGEL VIDANO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Sentenced to state prison pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant Juan Angel Vidano contends the matter must be remanded to the trial court to correct errors in the sentencing procedure and to prepare a corrected abstract of judgment. Because the judge’s sentencing procedure was contrary to law and the sentence imposed was inconsistent with the plea agreement, we must set aside defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing according to law.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.