Hazelbaker

Rancho Mirage Country Club Homeowners Ass'n v. Hazelbaker

Bad Law
2 Cal. App. 5th 252·2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 657·206 Cal. Rptr. 3d 233
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 2016E063272California4,699 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

—Defendants and appellants Thomas B. Hazelbaker and Lynn G. Hazelbaker own, through their family trust, a condominium in the Rancho Mirage Country Club development. Defendants made improvements to an exterior patio, which plaintiff and respondent Rancho Mirage Country Club Homeowners Association (Association) contended were in violation of the applicable covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs). The parties mediated the dispute pursuant to the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Davis-Stirling Act or the Act), codified at sections 4000 to 6150 of the Civil Code (formerly §§ 1350-1376). The mediation resulted in a written agreement. Subsequently, the Association filed the present lawsuit, alleging that defendants had failed to comply with their obligations under the mediation agreement to modify the property in certain ways.

While the lawsuit was pending, defendants made modifications to the patio to the satisfaction of the Association. Nevertheless, the parties could not reach agreement regarding attorney fees, which the Association asserted it was entitled to receive as the prevailing party.

The Association filed a motion for attorney fees and costs,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.