Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (the department), and real
party in interest, The Newhall Land and Farming Company (the developer), appeal from
a judgment granting a mandate petition. The judgment, entered October 15, 2012, was
granted in favor of plaintiffs: Center for Biological Diversity; Friends of the Santa Clara
River; Santa Clarita Organization for Planning the Environment; Wishtoyo
Foundation/Ventura Coastkeeper; and California Native Plant Society. The litigation and
appeal arise from the department’s December 3, 2010: certification of the revised final
environmental impact statement and impact report; approval of the Newhall Ranch
Resource Management and Development Plan (resource management and development
plan); the adoption of the Spineflower Conservation Plan and Master Streambed
Alteration Agreement (streambed alteration agreement); and issuance of two incidental
take permits. We issued an opinion reversing the October 15, 2012 judgment. (Center
for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish and Wildlife (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1105,
review granted July 9, 2014, No. S217763.) Our Supreme Court granted review…