People v. Jones CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2016E064993California178 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

After defendant appealed, and upon his request, this court appointed counsel to

represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979)

25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 setting forth a statement of

the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues, and requesting this court

to undertake a review of the entire record.

1 Defendant also filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate regarding the denial of a post-plea nonstatutory motion for the return of property. The writ was denied (case No.

E064984).

The parties stipulated that the police reports would provide a factual basis for the plea.

2 We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he

has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we

have independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no error.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

MILLER

J.

We concur:

RAMIREZ

P. J.

McKINSTER J.

3