People v. Wade CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2016C076949California6,080 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

Filed 8/12/16 P. v. Wade CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C076949

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 13F00198, 12F00479, 13F00308) v.

ANTHONY ELI WADE et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

In this gang-related robbery case, defendants Anthony Eli Wade (Anthony) and Daniel Hernandez Wade (Daniel) timely appeal, raising several issues, none of which we find meritorious.1 Accordingly, we shall affirm the judgments.

1 Because defendants share a surname, we refer to each by his first name. Juan Luis Jaramillo was also charged in this case, and held to answer after the preliminary hearing. However, the record shows Jaramillo resolved his case before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.