People v. Jackson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 2016C077072California5,784 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/12/16 P. v. Jackson CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C077072

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 13F03496)

v.

KHALIL OSHAR JACKSON et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Convicted in a number of robberies in south Sacramento in May 2013, defendants Khalil Oshar Jackson and Nico Maurice Pagan appeal, contending mostly that the evidence was insufficient to support some of their convictions. Jackson also contends he was denied one day of presentence custody credit. We agree with Jackson regarding the custody credit and agree with Pagan regarding two of his four convictions but otherwise find the evidence sufficient. Accordingly, with respect to Jackson, we…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.