People v. Virk CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 15, 2016C079777California3,725 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/15/16 P. v. Virk CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE, C079777

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF 13-4302)

v.

SHAWN VIRK,

Defendant and Appellant.

After the trial court denied defendant Shawn Virk’s motion to suppress his statement to the police (Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694] (Miranda)) and his subsequent motion to dismiss the information (Pen. Code, § 995)1 on the same basis, defendant pleaded no contest to one count of first degree burglary (§ 459) in August 2014 as part of an agreement resolving three pending cases.2 The trial court granted three years’ formal probation, with various terms and conditions.

Undesignated statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.