People v. Levine CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 15, 2016B266968California806 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manella, J.

INTRODUCTION

Appellant Scott William Levine is before us for a second time. On the prior occasion, we affirmed his conviction for possession of a firearm by a felon (see People v. Levine, Sept. 30, 1997, B103480 [unpub.]). Subsequently, appellant 1 filed a petition for recall of sentence pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.126. The trial court denied the petition, determining that appellant was statutorily ineligible for resentencing, as he was “armed with a firearm” during the commission of the offense. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude appellant was ineligible for resentencing. Accordingly, we affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND & PROCEDURAL HISTORY

As we recounted in our prior opinion, appellant was involved in a multi- vehicle accident. The vehicle appellant was driving had a broken key in the ignition switch. When questioned by Los Angeles Police Officer Victor Farhood and his partner, appellant stated he had borrowed the vehicle from a “‘friend.’” Additionally, appellant could not produce a driver’s license or vehicle registration. Officer Farhood handcuffed appellant and placed him in the patrol car because, according to the officer, appellant appeared “‘a little…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.