Santa Clarita Org. for Planning etc. v. Castaic Lake Water Agency

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 16, 2016B264284MCalifornia12,342 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/16/16 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

SANTA CLARITA ORGANIZATION B264284

FOR PLANNING AND THE

ENVIRONMENT, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS141673) Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

CASTAIC LAKE WATER AGENCY

et al., NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

Defendants and Respondents.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 28, 2016, be modified as follows: 1. On page 15, footnote 4 is deleted, which will require renumbering of all subsequent footnotes. 2. On page 15, the first full paragraph, line 3, the word “audiotape” is changed to “videotapes” so the sentence reads: Before undertaking substantial evidence review, we first address SCOPE’s argument that our analysis should include four items of evidence that the trial court refused to consider—namely, the raw videotapes and uncertified transcripts, prepared by SCOPE members, from the Agency’s board’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.