People v. Baylock CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 16, 2016C079095California5,624 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/16/16 P. v. Baylock CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C079095

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 14F05225)

v.

MICHAEL WAYNE BLAYLOCK,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Michael Wayne Blaylock guilty of assault with a deadly weapon and battery resulting in great bodily injury. On appeal, defendant contends the evidence showed he acted in self-defense and the evidence was therefore insufficient to support the convictions. He further contends the trial court erred in denying his Romero1 motion to strike his prior conviction for manslaughter. We affirm.

People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497.

FACTUAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.