People v. Borger CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 16, 2016A142682California3,909 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/16/16 P. v. Borger CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A142682

v. PHILIP VINCENT BORGER, (Mendocino County Super. Ct. No. Defendant and Appellant. SCUKCRCR1374654002)

After he was charged with possession of methamphetamine for sale, appellant Philip Vincent Borger moved under Penal Code section 1538.51 to suppress certain evidence that had been seized by law enforcement officers. Once the trial court denied the motion, Borger pleaded no contest to the charge and was placed on probation. On appeal, he challenges the denial of his motion to suppress. We have examined his arguments and find them unmeritorious. Accordingly, we will affirm the order from which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.