Eva Rehner v. Baxter Rice, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California

Good Law
717 F.2d 492·1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16350
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 3, 198377-2409California138 words

Opinion

717 F.2d 492 Eva REHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Baxter RICE, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California, Defendant-Appellee. No. 77-2409. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1983. Decided Oct. 3, 1983. Stephan V. Quesenberry, Seattle, Wash., Art Bunce, Escondido, Cal., Indian Legal Services, for Rehner. William R. Winship, Jr., Alan S. Meth, San Diego, Cal., argued, for Rice; Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., on brief. Before BROWNING, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, CANBY, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 In accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Rice v. Rehner, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3291 , 77 L.Ed.2d 961 (U.S.1983), reversing and remanding 678 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir.1982), the judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.