United States v. Floyd Harshman
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 201613-30030California900 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
AUG 17 2016
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-30030
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:12-cr-00003-RRB-1 v.
FLOYD EVERETT HARSHMAN, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 4, 2016 Anchorage, Alaska
Before: FISHER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Floyd Harshman appeals his conviction and sentence following entry of a
guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement. He argues that the waiver of his appellate
rights in the plea agreement is unenforceable and that the district court abused its
discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We dismiss his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. appeal based on the waiver. See United States v. Rahman, 642 F.3d 1257, 1259
(9th Cir. 2011) (“Because an appeal from the denial of his motion to…