People v. Hand CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 17, 2016C080216California1,232 words

Opinion

Opinion

Duarte, J.

BACKGROUND

In exchange for dismissal of various charges, defendant pled no contest to second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459)2 and admitted a prior strike for robbery. He had been convicted in 2001 of two counts of robbery (§ 211) with an enhancement for personally using a gun (§ 12022.53). Following his plea, he was permitted to enroll in a six-month residential drug treatment program. It was “an opportunity to complete the program in order to show the judge that he [could] earn a Romero and probation.” Defendant entered a treatment program but was discharged approximately six weeks later. At sentencing, defendant presented a letter to the trial court, which his attorney interpreted as a Romero motion and a request for probation. In the letter, defendant explained that 40 days into his rehabilitation program, he took a urine test and was told he had tested “dirty for things I’ve never used before.” He continued: “This is when I screwed up, I got scared and I got high and missed the court date my attorney set up for me. I freely admit that I messed up by getting high and running but at the same time I wasn’t out there messing up [committing more crimes].” He attributed his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.