United States v. Kejuan Moore

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 201615-50491California217 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 17 2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50491

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00215-DSF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

KEJUAN CHAVIZ MOORE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 16, 2016**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Kejuan Chaviz Moore appeals from the revocation of supervised release and

11-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Moore’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). provided Moore the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.