People v. Page CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Appellate counsel has identified the following issues that "might arguably support

the appeal" (Anders, supra, 386 U.S. at p. 744):

(1) Is Page's guilty plea constitutionally valid?

2 (2) Did the trial court err by denying Page's motion to withdraw his plea?

(3) Did the trial court err by denying Page's Marsden motions?

(4) Did the trial court err by failing to appoint a new attorney to file a motion to

withdraw the plea?

(5) Was Page's waiver of the right to appeal valid?

A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders,

supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the issues referred to by counsel, has disclosed no

reasonably arguable appellate issues. Page has been represented by competent counsel

on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

O'ROURKE, J.

WE CONCUR:

HALLER, Acting P. J.

McDONALD, J.

3