Jorge Mercado v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
668 F. App'x 272
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 201613-70662California232 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Petitioner Jorge David Mercado, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. When Petitioner applied for asylum in 1995, he was a minor child whose mother had been granted asylum. The child of an alien who is granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. § 1158 “may, if not otherwise eligible for asylum under this section, be granted the same status as the alien if accompanying, or following to join, such alien.” 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (b)(3)(A). The government failed to process Petitioner’s asylum application until 2009, by which time Petitioner had reached the age of 21 and married. We remand on an open record for the BIA to consider whether Petitioner was entitled to derivative asylum pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (b)(3), or otherwise, when he applied for asylum in 1995, and whether he should be granted asylum nunc pro tunc to that time. Because we remand for the BIA to consider whether Petitioner should be granted asylum nunc pro tunc, we do not reach the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.