Chau

Chau v. Citibank CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 19, 2016D068425California4,689 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/19/16 Chau v. Citibank CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL CHAU, D068425

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00098482-

CU-FR-CTL)

CITIBANK, N.A., as Successor Trustee, etc., et al.

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Katherine

Bacal, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Elliott N. Kanter and Elliott N. Kanter for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Houser & Allison, Eric D. Houser and Gabriel Ozel for Defendants and

Respondents.

Paul Chau sued Citibank, N.A., and several other defendants after Citibank, as

successor trustee of an investment trust, foreclosed on Chau's home and purchased the property…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.