Chase Bank v. Arbogast CA4/2

Filed 8/22/16 Chase Bank v. Arbogast CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

CHASE BANK USA, N.A.,

Cross-complainant and E063261 Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. MCC1300894) v.

OPINION

TOMI ARBOGAST,

Cross-defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Raquel A. Marquez,

Judge. Affirmed.

Lieberg, Oberhansley & Strohmeyer and Jon H. Lieberg for Cross-defendant and

Appellant.

1 Bryan Cave, Glenn J. Plattner and Richard P. Steelman, for Cross-complainant

and Respondent.

Chase Bank USA, N.A. (the Bank) initiated foreclosure proceedings on Tomi

Arbogast’s house in Temecula. Arbogast sued the Bank (1) to quiet title; (2) to obtain

an injunction; and (3) to obtain declaratory relief. The Bank…