People v. Padilla CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 2016B262576California1,462 words

Opinion

Opinion

Segal, J.

Filed 8/23/16 P. v. Padilla CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

THE PEOPLE, B262576

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VA134826) v.

URIEL TAPIA PADILLA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Yvonne T. Sanchez, Judge. Affirmed.

Richard L. Fitzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_______________________

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. The Charges During a warrantless search of Uriel Tapia Padilla’s residence on October 25, 2013, police found two scales and $14,649 in a bedroom. The police…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.