Century Surety Co. v. Motz CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 2016D067696California5,543 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

Filed 8/23/16 Century Surety Co. v. Motz CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, D067696

Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2008-00081030- v. CU-IC-CTL)

DOUGLAS W. MOTZ et al.,

Defendants, Cross-Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald S.

Prager, Judge. Motion to dismiss denied. Appeal to be treated as a petition for writ of

mandate. Petition granted in part and denied in part with directions.

Woolls & Peer, H. Douglas Galt, and Jeffrey A. Dollinger for Defendant, Cross-

Complainant and Respondent.

Skane Wilcox, Elizabeth A. Skane and J. Douglas Caffarel for Defendants,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.