People v. McKay CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 2016B267749California570 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/24/16 P. v. McKay CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B267749

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA412373) v.

MARK ANTHONY MCKAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:*

Defendant and appellant Mark Anthony McKay (defendant) filed a notice of appeal from his sentence or other matters occurring after he entered a plea of no contest. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), raising no issues. On May 31, 2016, we notified defendant of his counsel’s brief and gave him leave to file, within 30 days, his own brief or letter stating any grounds or argument he might wish to have considered. That…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.